Selasa, 09 April 2019

Android spyware Exodus makes the leap to iOS devices - Engadget

NurPhoto via Getty Images

Researchers at security firm Lookout recently discovered an iOS version of Exodus spyware that typically targets Android devices. Before you go wiping your iPhone to ensure you aren't being spied on, it's worth noting that the iOS version of the malware has only been found in third-party app marketplaces and hasn't made its way into the walled garden that is Apple's official App Store.

According to Lookout, Exodus for iOS was found on a number of phishing sites that were designed to trick customers of mobile carriers in Italy and Turkmenistan. The spyware was determined to be a stripped down port of the Android version. If installed on a device, the malicious software could steal contacts, photos, videos and audio recordings, GPS information and device location data. An attacker could use the app also perform on-demand audio recordings. The iOS variant of Exodus uploaded the stolen information to the same server as the Android malware, suggesting a direct connection between the attacks.

The Exodus attack initially used enterprise certificates signed by Apple, which made it possible for victims to install the app on their device despite downloading it outside of the App Store. Apple has since revoked those certificates, meaning the attack has largely been squashed. Still, it's a good reminder that iOS devices aren't immune to attacks. It's best to stick to Apple's official App Store to avoid falling victim to spyware.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/09/exodus-spyware-ios/

2019-04-09 21:14:16Z
52780265126276

Slack joins forces with Microsoft Office 365 - TechRadar

Businesses use a wide variety of apps, tools and services to communicate and collaborate everyday and now Slack is making things easier for Office 365 users by integrating Microsoft's services into its platform.

The messaging service is getting a new Outlook calendar and mail app, an updated OneDrive app and users will now be able to preview Office files directly within Slack.

The company is making it easier to keep track of all your meetings and calendar invites by bringing them into Slack through the new Outlook calendar app. Users will receive a message when a meeting invite arrives and they will even be able to respond with just one click.

Reminders to join Skype, Webex or Zoom meetings will also appear and the Outlook calendar app will now be able to set your Slack status automatically based on your calendar including setting “out of office” as your status if it has been enabled in Outlook.

Deeper integration

Slack users can now bring emails right into their channels thanks to the addition of Outlook mail integration. They will even be able to forward emails directly from Outlook into a Slack channel with the new Outlook add-in.

Importing files from Microsoft's cloud storage service will also be possible as a result of an update to Slack's OneDrive app. This functionality is similar to the company's existing Dropbox and Google Drive integration which allows users to browse files and add them into a channel or direct message.

Working with Office documents will now be easier in Slack as the company is enabling full previews of PowerPoint slides, Word documents and Excel spreadsheets. These files can be previewed without having to open them and the firm hopes to bring this functionality to OneDrive files as well.

While Microsoft Teams has been gaining ground in its fight against Slack, many businesses often rely on both products for their workloads. By offering greater integration with Microsoft's products, Slack is giving its users another reason to continue using its platform as opposed to searching for an alternative.

Via The Verge

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.techradar.com/news/slack-joins-forces-with-microsoft-office-365

2019-04-09 18:45:00Z
52780265081929

AT&T's mobile 5G goes live in seven more cities - Engadget

David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

American carriers are still engaged in their endless game of 5G oneupmanship. AT&T has expanded its fledgling mobile 5G network to "parts" of seven more cities, including Austin, Los Angeles, Nashville, Orlando, San Diego, San Francisco and San Jose. The move puts AT&T's real 5G in a total of 19 cities, making Verizon's (Engadget's parent company) two-city rollout seem modest by comparison. With that said, the usual caveats apply.

To begin with, current 5G coverage tends to be spotty, usually due to high frequencies that limit coverage and affect signals indoors. There's also the not-so-small matter of device support. Right now, you're relegated to a Netgear 5G hotspot. Smartphones like the Galaxy S10 5G won't start arriving until later in the spring. This is an important step toward mainstream adoption of 5G, but it won't come close to normalcy until you don't have to be picky about where and how you use the technology.

Verizon owns Engadget's parent company, Verizon Media. Rest assured, Verizon has no control over our coverage. Engadget remains editorially independent.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/09/att-5g-live-in-seven-more-cities/

2019-04-09 17:32:04Z
52780265029366

The AI Race Expands: Qualcomm Reveals “Cloud AI 100” Family of Datacenter AI Inference Accelerators for 2020 - AnandTech

The impact that advances in convolutional neural networking and other artificial intelligence technologies have made to the processor landscape in the last decade is unescapable. AI has become the buzzword, the catalyst, the thing that all processor makers want a piece of, and that all software vendors are eager to invest in to develop new features and new functionality. A market that outright didn’t exist at the start of this decade has over the last few years become a center of research and revenue, and already some processor vendors have built small empires out of it.

But this modern era of AI is still in its early days and the market has yet to find a ceiling; datacenters continue to buy AI accelerators in bulk, and deployment of the tech is increasingly ratcheting up in consumer processors as well. In a market that many believe is still up for grabs, processor markers across the globe are trying to figure out how they can become the dominant force in one of the greatest new processor markets in a generation. In short, the AI gold rush is in full swing, and right now everyone is lining up to sell the pickaxes.

In terms of the underlying technology and the manufacturers behind them, the AI gold rush has attracted interest from every corner of the technology world. This has ranged from GPU and CPU companies to FPGA firms, custom ASIC markers, and more. There is a need for inference at the edge, inference at the cloud, training in the cloud – AI processing at every level, served by a variety of processors. But among all of these facets of AI, the most lucrative market of all is the market at the top of this hierarchy: the datacenter. Expansive, expensive, and still growing by leaps and bounds, the datacenter market is the ultimate feast or famine setup, as operators are looking to buy nothing short of massive quantities of discrete processors. And now, one of the last juggernauts to sit on the sidelines of the datacenter AI market is finally making its move: Qualcomm

This morning at their first Qualcomm AI Day, the 800lb gorilla of the mobile world announced that they are getting into the AI accelerator market, and in an aggressive way. At their event, Qualcomm announced their first discrete dedicated AI processors, the Qualcomm Cloud AI 100 family. Designed from the ground up for the AI market and backed by what Qualcomm is promising to be an extensive software stack, the company is throwing their hat into the ring for 2020, looking to establish themselves as a major vendor of AI inference accelerators for a hungry market.

But before we too far into things here, it’s probably best to start with some context for today’s announcement. What Qualcomm is announcing today is almost more of a teaser than a proper reveal – and certainly far from a technology disclosure. The Cloud AI 100 family of accelerators are products that Qualcomm is putting together for the 2020 timeframe, with samples going out later this year. In short, we’re probably still a good year out from commercial products shipping, so Qualcomm is playing things cool, announcing their efforts and their rationale behind them, but not the underlying technology. For now it’s about making their intentions known well in advance, especially to the big customers they are going to try to woo. But still, today’s announcement is an important one, as Qualcomm has made it clear that they are going in a different direction than the two juggernauts they’ll be competing with: NVIDIA and Intel.

The Qualcomm Cloud AI 100 Architecture: Dedicated Inference ASIC

So what exactly is Qualcomm doing? In a nutshell, the company is developing a family of AI inference accelerators for the datacenter market. Though not quite a top-to-bottom initiative, these accelerators will come in a variety of form factors and TDPs to fit datacenter operator needs. And within this market Qualcomm expects to win by virtue of offering the most efficient inference accelerators on the market, offering performance well above current GPU and FPGA frontrunners.

The actual architectural details on the Cloud AI 100 family are slim, however Qualcomm has given us just enough to work with. To start with, these new parts will be manufactured on a 7nm process – presumably TSMC’s performance-oriented 7nm HPC process. The company will offer a variety of cards, but it’s not clear at this time if they are actually designing more than one processor. And, we’re told, this is an entirely new design built from the ground up; so it’s not say a Snapdragon 855 with all of the AI bits scaled up.

In fact it’s this last point that’s probably the most important. While Qualcomm isn’t offering architectural details for the accelerator today, the company is making it very clear that this is an AI inference accelerator and nothing more. It’s not being called an AI training accelerator, it’s not being called a GPU, etc. It’s only being pitched for AI inference – efficiently executing pre-trained neural networks.

This is an important distinction because, while the devil is in the details, Qualcomm’s announcement very strongly points to the underlying architecture being an AI inference ASIC – ala something like Google’s TPU family – rather than being a more flexible processor. Qualcomm is of course far from the first vendor to build an ASIC specifically for AI processing, but while other AI ASICs have either been focused at the low-end of the market or reserved for internal use (Google’s TPUs again being the prime example), Qualcomm is talking about an AI accelerator to be sold to customers for datacenter use. And, relative to the competition, what they are talking about is much more ASIC-like than the GPU-like designs everyone is expecting in 2020 out of front-runner NVIDIA and aggressive newcomer Intel.

That Qualcomm’s Cloud AI 100 processor design is so narrowly focused on AI inference is critical to its performance potential. In the processor design spectrum, architects balance flexibility with efficiency; the closer to a fixed-function ASIC a chip is, the more efficient it can be. Just as how GPUs offered a massive leap in AI performance over CPUs, Qualcomm wants to do the same thing over GPUs.

The catch, of course, is that a more fixed-function AI ASIC is giving up flexibility. Whether that’s the ability to handle new frameworks, new processing flows, or entirely new neural networking models remains to be seen. But Qualcomm will be making some significant tradeoffs here, and the big question is going to be whether these are the right tradeoffs, and whether the market as a whole is ready for a datacenter-scale AI ASIC.

Meanwhile, the other technical issue that Qualcomm will have to tackle with the Cloud AI 100 series is the fact that this is their first dedicated AI processor. Admittedly, everyone has to start somewhere, and in Qualcomm’s case they are looking to translate their expertise in AI at the edge with SoCs into AI at the datacenter. The company’s flagship Snapdragon SoCs have become a force to be reckoned with, and Qualcomm thinks that their experience in efficient designs and signal processing in general will give the company a significant leg up here.

It doesn’t hurt either that with the company’s sheer size, they have the ability to ramp up production very quickly. And while this doesn’t help them against the likes of NVIDIA and Intel – both of which can scale up at TSMC and their internal fabs respectively – it gives Qualcomm a definite advantage over the myriad of smaller Silicon Valley startups that are also pursuing AI ASICs.

Why Chase the Datacenter Inferencing Market?

Technical considerations aside, the other important factor in today’s announcement is why Qualcomm is going after the AI inference accelerator market. And the answer, in short, is money.

Projections for the eventual size of the AI inferencing market vary widely, but Qualcomm buys in to the idea that datacenter inference accelerators alone could be a $17 billion market by 2025. And if this proves to be true, then it would represent a sizable market that Qualcomm would otherwise be missing out on. One that would rival the entirely of their current chipmaking business.

It’s also worth noting here that this is explicitly the inference market, and not the overall datacenter inference + training market. This is an important distinction because while training is important as well, the computational requirements for training are very difference from inferencing. While accurate inferencing can be performed with relatively low-precision datatypes like INT8 (and sometimes lower), currently most training requires FP16 or more. Which requires a very different type of chip, especially when we’re talking about ASICs instead of something a bit more general purpose like a GPU.

This also leans into scale: while training a neural network can take a lot of resources, it only needs to be done once. Then it can be replicated out many times over to farms of inference accelerators. So as important as training is, potential customers will simply need many more inference accelerators than they will training-capable processors.

Meanwhile, though not explicitly said by the company, it’s clear that Qualcomm is looking to take down market leader NVIDIA, who has built a small empire out of AI processors even in these early days. Currently, NVIDIA’s Tesla T4, P4, and P40 accelerators make up the backbone of datacenter AI inference processors, with datacenter revenues as a whole proving to be quite profitable for NVIDIA. So even if the total datacenter market doesn’t grow quite as projected, it would still be quite lucrative.

Qualcomm also has to keep in mind the threat from Intel, who has very publicly telegraphed their own plans for the AI market. The company has several different AI initiatives, ranging from low-power Movidius accelerators to their latest Cascade Lake Xeon Scalable CPUs. However for the specific market Qualcomm is chasing, the biggest threat is probably Intel’s forthcoming Xe GPUs, which are coming out of the company’s recently rebuilt GPU division. Like Qualcomm, Intel is gunning for NVIDIA here, so there is a race for the AI inference market that none of the titans wish to lose.

Making It to the Finish Line

Qualcomm’s ambitions aside, for the next 12 months or so, the company’s focus is going to be on lining up its first customers. And to do this, the company has to show that it’s serious about what it’s doing with the Cloud AI 100 family, that it can deliver on the hardware, and that it can match the ease of use of rivals’ software ecosystems. None of this will be easy, which is why Qualcomm has needed to start now, so far ahead of when commercial shipments begin.

While Qualcomm has had various dreams of servers and the datacenter market for many years now, perhaps the most polite way to describe those efforts are “overambitious.” Case in point would be Qualcomm’s Centriq family of ARM-based server CPUs, which the company launched with great fanfare back in 2017, only for the entire project to collapse within a year. The merits of Centriq aside, Qualcomm is still a company that is largely locked to mobile processors and modems on the chipmaking side. So to get datacenter operators to invest in the Cloud AI family, Qualcomm not only needs a great plan for the first generation, but a plan for the next couple of generations beyond that.

The upshot here is that in the young, growing market for inference accelerators, datacenter operators are more willing to experiment with new processors than they are, say, CPUs. So there’s no reason to believe that the Cloud AI 100 series can’t be at least moderately successful right off the bat. But it will be up to Qualcomm to convince the otherwise still-cautious datacenter operators that Qualcomm’s wares are worth investing so many resources into.

Parallel to this is the software side of the equation. A big part of NVIDIA’s success thus far has been in their AI software ecosystem – itself is an expansion of their decade-old CUDA ecosystem – which has vexed GPU rival AMD for a while now. The good news for Qualcomm is that the most popular frameworks, runtimes, and tools have already been established; TensorFlow, Caffe2, and ONNX are the big targets, and Qualcomm knows it. Which is why Qualcomm is promising an extensive software stack right off the bat, because nothing less than that will do. But Qualcomm does have to get up to speed very quickly here, as how well their software stack actually works can make or break the whole project. Qualcomm needs to deliver good hardware and good software to succeed here.

But for the moment at least, Qualcomm's announcement today is a teaser – a proclamation of what’s to come. The company has developed a very ambitious plan to break into the growing AI inference accelerator market, and to deliver a processor significantly unlike anything else on the open market. And while getting from here to there is going to be a challenge, as one of the titans of the processor world Qualcomm is among the most capable out there, both in funding and engineering resources. So it’s as much a question of how badly Qualcomm wants the inference accelerator market as it is their ability to develop processors for it; and how well they can avoid the kind of missteps that have sunk their previous server processor plans.

Above all else, however, Qualcomm won’t simply take the inference accelerator market: they’re going to have to fight for it. This is NVIDIA’s market to lose and Intel has eyes on it as well, never mind all the smaller players from GPU vendors, FPGA vendors, and other ASIC players. Any and all of which can quickly rise and fall in what’s still a young market for an emerging technology. So while it’s still almost a year off, 2020 is quickly shaping up to be the first big battle for the AI accelerator market.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.anandtech.com/show/14187/qualcomm-reveals-cloud-ai-100-family-of-datacenter-ai-inference-accelerators-for-2020

2019-04-09 17:30:00Z
52780265129342

LG G8 ThinQ review: many gimmicks, not enough progress - The Verge

If you’re looking for a new phone in 2019 that has a bunch of features, the LG G8 ThinQ should be on your shortlist. Compared to something like the Google Pixel 3, a purposefully plain phone, the LG G8 is on the opposite side of the spectrum. It’s vibrant and chock-full of experimental software tweaks and fan-favorite hardware features. It’s refreshing to use a phone that’s capable of so much. LG places no walls around you; you can use as much or as little as it offers.

At its core, the G8 is a competent Android 9 Pie phone with the latest Snapdragon 855 processor and 6GB of RAM. It has a sharp 6.1-inch OLED display, a screen-rattling loudspeaker, and a headphone jack bolstered by a Quad DAC that sounds incredible with wired headphones. The G8 also offers wireless charging, supports microSD storage, and has an IP68 rating against water and dust ingress.

Most of what I just listed describes what you’ll also get in 2018’s LG G7 ThinQ, which you can find for roughly half the cost of the $840 G8. In fact, the G8’s design is mostly a rehash, with its 19.5:9 screen aspect ratio and wide notch to match, though the G8’s notch is a little different. Populated by a new Z Camera multisensor system, it can unlock the phone securely using your face or your hand’s vein structure. Z Camera also allows for the phone’s other big feature, Air Motion, which lets you use hand gestures to, say, raise the volume or pause a song in Spotify, without touching the G8.

6.5 Verge Score

Good Stuff

  • Comfortable to hold
  • Quad DAC yields great sound quality
  • Face Unlock is fast and easy
  • Improved battery capacity

Bad Stuff

  • Piezoelectric earpiece replacement isn’t loud enough
  • May not receive timely software updates
  • Hand ID and Air Motion are gimmicky and don’t always work

Digging deeper into the G8’s unique features, its notch houses an 8-megapixel selfie camera, a Time of Flight (ToF) sensor, and an infrared emitter. Once the object or person in the frame is covered in infrared light, the ToF sensor can detect its depth, which is critical for LG’s new features, Face Unlock and Hand ID. Face Unlock, as you might expect, gathers a 3D scan of your face angled in different ways, and it won’t unlock with a 2D image. I tried to fool it with a picture and a video recorded on a different phone, but I didn’t have any success. A good failure. Face Unlock is definitely fast and convenient enough that I rarely used the fingerprint sensor located on the phone’s back. However, I can’t say such positive things about Hand ID.

Hand ID unlocks your phone when it authenticates the unique vein layout in your palm above the Z Camera, and LG notes that this is a less secure method of protecting your phone. Hand ID is an interesting idea, but in practice, it’s slow to detect a match, often failing to read my hand accurately. Even when it’s successful, sometimes it asks for a secondary method of authentication. Hand ID is more of a roadblock than it is a viable way to gain access to the G8.

LG’s marketing loudly trumpets these new features, but when you pick up the phone, the device itself doesn’t make much of an effort to convince you to use them. That’s a shame because Face Unlock is one of my favorite features on the G8. But as for Hand ID and Air Motion, which we dig into below, they don’t rise above the status of party tricks that may delight but probably won’t convert onlookers (or even the person using the G8). The unique features are cool when they work. Even when they do, the Z Camera’s additions don’t enrich my experience to the extent that I’d pay a premium for them.

Some retailers are offering the G8 for $699 unlocked for use with any GSM or CDMA carrier, and if you’re able to find it for this price, you’ll get a lot of phone for your money. But my feelings about its highlight features aside, there’s the lingering issue of software updates. The most damning thing about every new LG phone that hits the market is that timely software updates are not forthcoming. Here’s a familiar refrain: LG has done too little to assure prospective buyers that this year’s flagship phone will be kept up to date.

In my colleague Chris Welch’s review of the G7 ThinQ in 2018, he said LG “promised to make a better, honest-to-goodness real effort at delivering future software updates at a timely pace.” That didn’t work out as planned. Android 9 Pie first launched in August 2018, though some G7 users are still waiting for the update. Things may change, eventually, but I don’t think that they’ll be any different for the G8. You’re buying an Android Pie phone that might be stuck on Pie for a long time after the release of its successor. Surprise me, LG.

Relative to the 2018 LG G7, the G8 feels more weighty and substantial, but unless you’re picking apart a spec sheet, you might not notice any differences. The nicest upgrade is the fact that the rear cameras now sit under the same piece of glass covering the rear of the phone, generating no camera bump or disturbance at all. Compared to its Android contemporaries, the G8 is one of the smaller flagships on the market, and it should appeal to people who find the Plus models from other manufacturers to be too big to handle.

On the inside, the G8 features the Snapdragon 855 processor that’s Qualcomm’s current best chip for Android phones, and the phone’s 6GB of RAM makes for a smooth experience. Switching through apps, scrolling around mindlessly, and putting the G8’s camera features to the test didn’t cause any noticeable hiccups. The 3,500mAh battery is a sizeable increase over the G7’s 3,000mAh, and it’s more than you’ll find in the Samsung Galaxy S10 or S10E. I didn’t have to worry about the G8 running out of battery on a typical busy day of taking pictures outside and chatting with friends on Snapchat, but it needed a refill every evening.

LG opted to swap the bright IPS LCD used in the G7 for an OLED display, which gives it deeper blacks and better contrast. The company also got rid of the earpiece, instead utilizing a piezoelectric speaker behind the screen to create sound with vibrations from the phone’s frame. This works well in quiet settings, and when paired with its loudspeaker, it creates a somewhat convincing stereo effect. But if you take a call on a windy day or in a busy restaurant, it is far too weak to hear clearly.

LG also uses the Z Camera to add bokeh to selfie portraits, but that really isn’t much of an improvement. Even the Google Pixel 2’s single-lens computational bokeh worked more effectively than LG’s bespoke hardware. Speaking of the camera performance, I’ve always felt that LG’s optics are on the edge of something great, but they remain a step behind the competition. Easy shots with generous amounts of natural light are decent, but they usually come out fuzzy around the edges and have a cooler color temperature than I like. Good shots are possible even at night, though LG’s Night view doesn’t hold a candle to the Huawei P30 Pro’s low-light capabilities or the Pixel’s Night Sight. Like last year’s phone, the G8 is still slow to capture, which leads to lots of blurry photos. Additionally, it has a hard time getting skin tones right, portrait shots have inconsistent bokeh, and the auto-exposure can be all over the place.

LG was able to patch previous phones with AI features that were said to enhance low-light performance, so I’m interested to see if LG could improve the state of things here. But when it comes to LG and delivering software when a device needs it the most, I’m not hopeful.

Despite its limitations, I think that this is the closest that an LG camera has come to producing photos that I’m happy posting to social media without retouching. If auto mode isn’t getting the job done, you can get good results with the manual mode, which lets you seize control over the usual variables like shutter speed and ISO, and the ultra wide angle shots are always fun to snap.

The Z Camera can do another interesting trick called Air Motion. It’s a feature that lets you control a few tasks with hand gestures. What it actually lets you do differs slightly depending on the app you’re using, though the procedure to initiate it is the same: hold your hand near the phone’s front-facing sensors, and wait until you see a stripe of blue light beneath the notch. Then, a small window will show your hand as viewed through the infrared camera. While using Spotify, for instance, you can tweak the volume by making a knob-turning motion or pause a song by moving your hand left or right of center. The controls are similar for other multimedia apps that you download on the G8, like YouTube, Amazon Music, and the preinstalled music and video apps. For practically any other app, the default Air Motion gesture is a pinch to capture a screenshot. Then you can set a custom shortcut to open any app that you have downloaded by moving your hand left or right of center.

I’m sure that Air Motion will appeal to some, but the only valid use case for the feature that I could dream up was if you need to turn up the volume or pause the music while you’re handling delicate pastry or painting a room. The feature isn’t fleshed out or anywhere near responsive enough to be a useful accessibility tool. In my experience, asking Google Assistant for help gets most jobs done faster, even though Assistant can’t take screenshots. To summon the voice assistant, you can push the dedicated side button on the G8, or just say, “Hey, Google.”

Outside of LG’s own sphere of design, other phones are going all in on new hardware features like hole-punch cameras and in-display fingerprint sensors. It’s not a big strike against the G8 that it doesn’t have these novelties, especially since we found the in-display fingerprint sensor in the Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus to be slow compared to traditional fingerprint sensors. But by comparison, the G8’s design is basically a repeat of last year’s LG G7 ThinQ, and sitting still in the smartphone market makes it an even harder sell.

Of course, some mainstays from past LG phones are a good thing. Its best-in-class haptics motor, for example, is always welcome to the party. More phones are beginning to take haptic feedback seriously, providing more nuanced vibrations than bleary buzzes, and LG still leads the pack of Android phone makers. The haptics almost purr when you navigate the G8. Whether you’re running through basic tasks, like texting, or scrolling through your list of opened apps using Android 9 Pie’s pill-shaped home button, expressive haptics make bland tasks a little more fun.

Another feature I’m always happy to see is the headphone jack. And since it’s in an LG flagship phone, it’s not just any headphone jack. There’s a Quad DAC built in that dramatically improves the sound quality with wired headphones. It’s not activated by default, but when I switch on the Quad DAC, music occupies a more expansive soundstage, with each instrument and layer of the track coming through clearer. The additional DTS: X virtual surround sound effect adds a bit more attack to your tracks if you want a fuller, bass-heavy sound. To achieve similar results with other phones, you’ll have to get a portable DAC or stick to using it at home with a desk-bound DAC. Either option is an added expense and quite a bit more cumbersome than what LG provides.

The G8 continues LG’s dead sprint to innovate. Most times, it seems, just for the sake of saying that it tried. The byproduct is an improvement, in the most inconsequential of ways, over the G7 ThinQ. Ultimately, it’s an incremental upgrade that offers better battery life, a better screen, a faster processor, and more RAM. This year’s phone places emphasis on the new Z Camera that enables Hand ID and Air Motion, and while interesting, I don’t think that they’re selling points that you should care about. Without those features, this year’s phone doesn’t move the bar.

LG usually overhauls its G-series each year, but comparing it to Apple’s smartphone naming conventions, the G8 is more of an “S” upgrade to the G7 ThinQ. Many things about it are the same, but there are a few improvements that might interest you. Most S-year phones are worth checking out because, as Dieter Bohn said in his review of the Pixel 3, “It’s better to be on the S-cycle: you get a faster phone, better camera, and the fixes that come after a year with the original design.” But aside from improved specs, the things that changed in the G8 ThinQ are things that I think most users can carry on without.

Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence editorial content, though Vox Media may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. For more information, see our ethics policy.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/9/18301982/lg-g8-thinq-review-android-phone-snapdragon-855-6-gb-ram-z-camera-sensor

2019-04-09 16:00:00Z
52780265113876