While it is unclear if the widely rumored 16-inch MacBook Pro will launch in 2019 or 2020, the latest report from DigiTimes claims that Apple will begin receiving volume shipments of the notebook in the fourth quarter of this year. Taiwan-based manufacturer Quanta Computer is said to be the key supplier.
The report reiterates that the 16-inch MacBook Pro will have an ultra-thin-bezel design, suggesting the overall size of the notebook might be similar to the existing 15-inch MacBook Pro despite having a larger display.
16-inch MacBook Pro concept by MacRumors
Apple receiving volume shipments of the 16-inch MacBook Pro in the fourth quarter does not necessarily mean the notebook will launch in the fourth quarter. Apple may simply be planning to stockpile the 16-inch MacBook Pro ahead of the U.S. government's proposed 15 percent import tariff on an additional round of Chinese goods, including notebooks, slated to take effect December 15.
Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo originally said the 16-inch MacBook Pro would launch in the fourth quarter of 2019 with an all-new design, including a scissor switch keyboard. As of late, however, Kuo has more vaguely stated that a "new MacBook model" with a scissor keyboard will launch in mid 2020. It's unclear if the "new MacBook model" that Kuo has referred to more recently is the 16-inch MacBook Pro.
The leaked Touch Bar design lends credence to the Esc key also being a separate, physical key again, as can be seen when zooming in to the previously leaked 16-inch MacBook Pro icon.
MacRumors has confirmed the location of the Touch Bar image in macOS Catalina. The filename includes "Device16."
Leaked 16-inch MacBook Pro vs current 15-inch MacBook Pro image. Touch Bar and size differences pic.twitter.com/b1qJvuo2hM
DigiTimes previously said the 16-inch MacBook Pro would launch by the end of October, and today is the final day of the month. The site does not have the best track record when it comes to the timing of new Apple products, but its connections within Apple's supply chain are occasionally accurate.
Jennifer Aniston, left, and Steve Carell in a scene from “The Morning Show,” which debuts Friday together with the Apple TV+ video service.
Photo:
Hilary B Gayle/Associated Press
Apple Inc.
became a colossus by redefining gadgets including the smartphone, the tablet and the smartwatch. As it takes aim at Hollywood, it is working from a very different script.
On Friday, the company plans to launch the Apple TV+ video service, its contender in the battle between media and tech giants for people’s streaming dollars. Apple TV+ is slated to start with nine programs, including a buzzy drama about television news called “The Morning Show” featuring Jennifer Aniston,
Reese Witherspoon
and Steve Carell. Other offerings include “See,” set in a future when humans lack sight, and “Snoopy in Space,” for children.
Apple’s enormous size, $100-billion cash hoard and fat profit margins mean it can afford the costs of developing and distributing new content. And the more than 900 million iPhones and 500 million other Apple gadgets in use world-wide give it an enormous, built-in base of potential TV+ customers.
But entertainment takes Apple well outside its wheelhouse, and much about its approach to the streaming wars departs from its usual strategy.
Apple is used to charging far more for its iPhones, iPads and Macs than rivals do for their products. It controls its own ecosystem of hardware and software products and carefully rolls out new versions of its gadgets once a year at most.
Speakers at WSJ Tech Live discuss the increasing competition for consumers as a growing number of video-streaming services come to market.
With TV+, Apple is charging less than competitors and pushing its service aggressively on other platforms. A company accustomed to hits is entering a world where TV shows and movies fail with regularity. And the secretive Silicon Valley titan is contending with critical scrutiny in Hollywood that far exceeds the business’s importance to Apple’s bottom line.
Critical reviews of the offerings on Apple TV+ have been mixed. Time said “The Morning Show” lacks the depth and spirit of top TV shows, while New York Media’s Vulture called it a “glossy, largely compelling new series.” Hollywood-focused Variety’s critics found fault with other Apple shows, saying none was “stellar enough to justify someone buying in to a whole new streaming service.”
An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
“Honestly the world should give Apple a little leeway,” said “See” executive producer Francis Lawrence. “Nobody can be perfect 100% of the time.”
Hollywood is central to Chief Executive
Tim Cook’s
effort to refashion Apple as a services company as sales have slowed for its original products. Sales of its bread-and-butter iPhone fell 14% for the fiscal year ended in September, dragging the company’s total revenue down 2% to $260.17 billion.
A Stream of Choices
Several new video services are launching to challenge Netflix. How they compare:
Source: the companies
The hardware heavyweight, though, has a threadbare entertainment library. So its service will cost $4.99 monthly for subscribers and will be free for a year with the purchase of a new iPhone, iPad or Mac.
Netflix Inc., which charges $12.99 a month for its most popular service, pioneered the category and offers more than 1,500 shows and 4,000 movies.
Walt Disney Co.
will charge $6.99 for Disney+, which launches 11 days after Apple’s offering, with popular franchises such as “Star Wars.”
Apple struck deals to make its Apple TV app available on Roku and on smart TVs from
Samsung Electronics Co.
Mr. Cook called the offering a bold move during a Wednesday call with analysts. He said the price is aggressive because Apple wants as many people as possible to view the shows. “This allows us to focus on maximizing subscribers,” he said.
Apple is also rolling out its programming in a way that straddles Netflix’s all-at-once strategy with the one-episode-a-week style of HBO and others. Initially, it will offer three episodes of some shows, such as “For All Mankind,” about the U.S. space program in a world where Russia landed first on the moon, and add a new episode each subsequent week. Others such as “Dickinson,” about a young Emily Dickinson, will be available in their totality.
Apple is famously fastidious about its brand. So far, its slate of shows features themes of resilience and aspiration. The focus—combined with an aversion to over-the-top gratuitous sex, violence and language—has led some Hollywood creators to question if Apple TV+ will be as risqué as Netflix, FX or HBO, whose programs often embrace the underbelly of culture and society.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
Should apple move into creating content or stick to making devices? Join the conversation below.
To be sure, in entertainment the definition of a brand is often fluid, especially if the shows designed to fit that brand fail to catch on and a show that doesn’t becomes a success.
“You’re not allowed to go into this without pretending you have a brand, but then your brand becomes whatever your hit show is,” said producer Mike Royce, whose credits include “Everybody Loves Raymond” and the reboot of “One Day at a Time.”
If Apple can amass 50 million subscribers for TV+, about as many as it has for its music-streaming service, it would add $3 billion in annual sales, estimates Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst with Bernstein Research. That steady subscription revenue would help reduce iPhone dependency—though it is tiny compared with Apple’s $250 billion in total annual sales.
Apple also wants to draw viewers to its TV app and encourage them to subscribe to other services, such as Starz and Showtime, that can be accessed through the app, according to people familiar with the strategy. It gets a 30% cut of other subscriptions initially.
The business strategy is being fashioned by
Peter Stern,
who joined Apple in 2016 after overseeing strategy at Time Warner Cable Inc. Last year, the Yale Law School graduate was promoted to oversee Apple’s video, news, books, iCloud and ad-services businesses. He has looked for ways to bundle services and directly market subscriptions, people familiar with the strategy said.
The company unveiled one offer Wednesday, with actor Hailee Steinfeld, who stars in “Dickinson,” announcing on Instagram that TV+ will be free to college students who subscribe to Apple Music.
Apple’s decision to bundle TV+ with sales of its gadgets will hurt its hardware business for financial reporting purposes but help services, because it reduces a $699 iPhone sale by $60—the annual cost to subscribe to TV+—which will be recognized as services revenue, analysts say.
In the future, though, TV+ can serve as a marketing tool that deepens the appeal of new iPhones with incremental features, Mr. Sacconaghi said. “They now have something they can use to help maybe iPhone or other product demand,” he said.
Jennifer Aniston, left, and Steve Carell in a scene from “The Morning Show,” which debuts Friday together with the Apple TV+ video service.
Photo:
Hilary B Gayle/Associated Press
Apple Inc.
AAPL -0.01%
became a colossus by redefining gadgets including the smartphone, the tablet and the smartwatch. As it takes aim at Hollywood, it is working from a very different script.
On Friday, the company plans to launch the Apple TV+ video service, its contender in the battle between media and tech giants for people’s streaming dollars. Apple TV+ is slated to start with nine programs, including a buzzy drama about television news called “The Morning Show” featuring Jennifer Aniston,
Reese Witherspoon
and Steve Carell. Other offerings include “See,” set in a future when humans lack sight, and “Snoopy in Space,” for children.
Apple’s enormous size, $100-billion cash hoard and fat profit margins mean it can afford the costs of developing and distributing new content. And the more than 900 million iPhones and 500 million other Apple gadgets in use world-wide give it an enormous, built-in base of potential TV+ customers.
But entertainment takes Apple well outside its wheelhouse, and much about its approach to the streaming wars departs from its usual strategy.
Apple is used to charging far more for its iPhones, iPads and Macs than rivals do for their products. It controls its own ecosystem of hardware and software products and carefully rolls out new versions of its gadgets once a year at most.
Speakers at WSJ Tech Live discuss the increasing competition for consumers as a growing number of video-streaming services come to market.
With TV+, Apple is charging less than competitors and pushing its service aggressively on other platforms. A company accustomed to hits is entering a world where TV shows and movies fail with regularity. And the secretive Silicon Valley titan is contending with critical scrutiny in Hollywood that far exceeds the business’s importance to Apple’s bottom line.
Critical reviews of the offerings on Apple TV+ have been mixed. Time said “The Morning Show” lacks the depth and spirit of top TV shows, while New York Media’s Vulture called it a “glossy, largely compelling new series.” Hollywood-focused Variety’s critics found fault with other Apple shows, saying none was “stellar enough to justify someone buying in to a whole new streaming service.”
An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
“Honestly the world should give Apple a little leeway,” said “See” executive producer Francis Lawrence. “Nobody can be perfect 100% of the time.”
Hollywood is central to Chief Executive
Tim Cook’s
effort to refashion Apple as a services company as sales have slowed for its original products. Sales of its bread-and-butter iPhone fell 14% for the fiscal year ended in September, dragging the company’s total revenue down 2% to $260.17 billion.
A Stream of Choices
Several new video services are launching to challenge Netflix. How they compare:
Source: the companies
The hardware heavyweight, though, has a threadbare entertainment library. So its service will cost $4.99 monthly for subscribers and will be free for a year with the purchase of a new iPhone, iPad or Mac.
Netflix Inc., which charges $12.99 a month for its most popular service, pioneered the category and offers more than 1,500 shows and 4,000 movies.
Walt Disney Co.
will charge $6.99 for Disney+, which launches 11 days after Apple’s offering, with popular franchises such as “Star Wars.”
Apple struck deals to make its Apple TV app available on Roku and on smart TVs from
Samsung Electronics Co.
Mr. Cook called the offering a bold move during a Wednesday call with analysts. He said the price is aggressive because Apple wants as many people as possible to view the shows. “This allows us to focus on maximizing subscribers,” he said.
Apple is also rolling out its programming in a way that straddles Netflix’s all-at-once strategy with the one-episode-a-week style of HBO and others. Initially, it will offer three episodes of some shows, such as “For All Mankind,” about the U.S. space program in a world where Russia landed first on the moon, and add a new episode each subsequent week. Others such as “Dickinson,” about a young Emily Dickinson, will be available in their totality.
Apple is famously fastidious about its brand. So far, its slate of shows features themes of resilience and aspiration. The focus—combined with an aversion to over-the-top gratuitous sex, violence and language—has led some Hollywood creators to question if Apple TV+ will be as risqué as Netflix, FX or HBO, whose programs often embrace the underbelly of culture and society.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
Are you considering an AppleTV subscription? Why or why not? Join the conversation below.
To be sure, in entertainment the definition of a brand is often fluid, especially if the shows designed to fit that brand fail to catch on and a show that doesn’t becomes a success.
“You’re not allowed to go into this without pretending you have a brand, but then your brand becomes whatever your hit show is,” said producer Mike Royce, whose credits include “Everybody Loves Raymond” and the reboot of “One Day at a Time.”
If Apple can amass 50 million subscribers for TV+, about as many as it has for its music-streaming service, it would add $3 billion in annual sales, estimates Toni Sacconaghi, an analyst with Bernstein Research. That steady subscription revenue would help reduce iPhone dependency—though it is tiny compared with Apple’s $250 billion in total annual sales.
Apple also wants to draw viewers to its TV app and encourage them to subscribe to other services, such as Starz and Showtime, that can be accessed through the app, according to people familiar with the strategy. It gets a 30% cut of other subscriptions initially.
The business strategy is being fashioned by
Peter Stern,
who joined Apple in 2016 after overseeing strategy at Time Warner Cable Inc. Last year, the Yale Law School graduate was promoted to oversee Apple’s video, news, books, iCloud and ad-services businesses. He has looked for ways to bundle services and directly market subscriptions, people familiar with the strategy said.
The company unveiled one offer Wednesday, with actor Hailee Steinfeld, who stars in “Dickinson,” announcing on Instagram that TV+ will be free to college students who subscribe to Apple Music.
Apple’s decision to bundle TV+ with sales of its gadgets will hurt its hardware business for financial reporting purposes but help services, because it reduces a $699 iPhone sale by $60—the annual cost to subscribe to TV+—which will be recognized as services revenue, analysts say.
In the future, though, TV+ can serve as a marketing tool that deepens the appeal of new iPhones with incremental features, Mr. Sacconaghi said. “They now have something they can use to help maybe iPhone or other product demand,” he said.
iFixit has completed its traditional teardown of Apple’s latest AirPods and, just as Apple promised, it’s bad news for repairs. The organization awarded the noise-canceling buds a big fat zero repairability score, noting that their “non-modular, glued-together design and lack of replacement parts makes repair both impractical and uneconomical.” That’s the same score as bothversions of the original AirPods.
This means that once the battery in your $249 AirPods Pro degrades and eventually dies, there’s no chance of repairing them yourself. Instead, you’ll have to send them back to Apple for recycling, or take part in the “battery service” program at a cost of $49-per-earbud out of warranty.
The teardown does reveal a couple of interesting details about the design of the earbuds. First is the fact that they’re a whole third heavier than the original AirPods, thanks to new features like active noise-cancellation, and an inward-facing microphone. The teardown also notes that the one user-replaceable part of the earbuds, the silicone ear-tip, uses a custom design that makes them incompatible with third-party models. That said, the popularity of the AirPods all but guarantees other companies will be making third-party tips soon.
Most intriguing is the discovery of a watch-style battery inside each earbud. iFixit notes that it’s a similar battery to what it found in Samsung’s Galaxy Buds which could be replaced. However, the same is not true of the AirPods Pro, whose battery is tethered by a soldered cable.
It’s no surprise that the AirPods Pro are a disposable product, designed to be as small and lightweight as possible. And compared to the amount of waste generated by the consumer electronics industry, the environmental impact of each AirPod Pro is likely to be low. But as Apple boasts about the amount of renewable energy its buildings use, and the amount of recycled materials it uses in its products, it’s a shame to see one of its biggest product successes in recent years remain so disposable.
Update October 31st, 6:45AM ET: Updated with details of Apple’s “battery service” program.
With the popularity of the iPhone and iPad comes a sea of accessories for both devices. While iPhones and iPads are powerful devices on their own, they can be enhanced by accessories that protect them, let you use them in different ways, and make them work harder for you.
But sifting through the plethora of cases, cables, keyboards, adapters and other accessories available today is a daunting task. It's made even harder thanks to all the different companies making accessories—while that means you can find iPhone and iPad accessories to fit any budget, it also means that not all of those accessories are worth buying (the cheapest option isn't always the way to go, nor is the most expensive option the best out there).
To make things easier for you, Ars has spent the fall testing a slew of iPhone and iPad accessories in order to find the best and most useful ones that are worth your hard-earned dollars.
Note: Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.
Enlarge/ Anker's PowerLine+ II USB-C to Lightning cable.
Valentina Palladino
One lightning cable is never enough, even if you just have one Apple device. Anker's PowerLine+ II family of cords are arguably better than Apple's own lightning cables because they're built to last longer and they're MFi-certified. The double-braided nylon cables won't break or fray like others might, and they come in different lengths so you don't have to be so physically close to a power source while you're charging your iPhone or iPad. They also support iPhone fast charging when connected to Apple or other Anker PD chargers. While a charging cable is only one part of the puzzle in terms of power delivery and charging speed, Anker's Powerline+ II cords are solid options that provide all of the features you'd get from an Apple cable plus even better build quality and value for the money.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best portable battery pack
Anker PowerCore 10000 PD Redux
ZMI PowerPack 20000
The RAVPower PD Pioneer 45W GaN Wall Charger (left) and Nekteck 4-port 72W USB-C PD Charger (right).
Jeff Dunn
The RAVPower charger uses GaN tech that lets it take up very little space for the power it provides.
Jeff Dunn
The benefits of a portable battery should be obvious by now: when your iPhone or iPad is low on power and there’s no outlet in sight, it’ll keep your device kicking. If you need a battery to primarily charge an iPhone, get Anker’s PowerCore 10000 PD Redux. It’s not the cheapest device in its class, but it has an 18W USB-C Power Delivery (PD) that can safely charge newer iPhones (and most other non-Galaxy Note 10+ phones) at maximum speeds. The battery itself can recharge quickly at 18W through that USB-C PD port. There’s a USB-A port rated at 12W beyond that, though the whole pack can only output 18W in total at a time.
Still, its 10,000mAh (or 36Wh) capacity is enough to get an iPhone 11 roughly two charges. There’s a USB-C to USB-C charging cable in the box. And most notably, it’s supremely portable, weighing less than seven ounces and measuring just 106×52.3×25.5mm. That means it can easily fit in a pants pocket or handbag. Having this kind of fast-charging power in a design that’s this small and well-built makes the PowerCore 10000 PD Redux ideal for travel. Just remember that you need an MFi-certified USB-C to Lightning cable like the PowerLine+ II above to actually take advantage of its fast charging speeds with an iPhone.
If you need a battery pack for charging a newer iPad, meanwhile, get the ZMI PowerPack 20000. It includes a 45W USB-C PD port that’s powerful enough to charge the latest iPad Pros—and various 12- and 13-inch laptops—at their fastest possible rate. (Those laptops just have to charge at 15V/3A, as the PowerPack maxes out at 40W of power at a 20V charge.) There are two USB-A ports that output around 12W of power alongside that, though the whole pack can only output a maximum of 45W at any given time. The 20,000mAh (or 72Wh) capacity is enough to give roughly one and a half charges to an 11-inch iPad Pro. It’s not USB-IF certified, but we’ve used it safely for about a year now, and there are no widespread reports of failure across the Web. Again, the PowerPack 20000 stands out in the design department: its metallic finish feels premium, and at 14 ounces and 160×82×21mm, it’s more compact than most power banks with this level of power. Plus, at $70, it’s more affordable than most of its peers, and it includes a USB-C to USB-C fast charging cable in the box.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best wall charger
Nekteck 4-port 72W USB-C PD Charger
RAVPower PD Pioneer 45W GaN Wall Charger
The ZMI PowerPack 20000 (left) and the Anker PowerCore 10000 PD Redux (center) next to a 10.5-inch iPad Air.
Jeff Dunn
A look at the front of our two battery pack picks.
Jeff Dunn
Though Apple now includes an 18W fast charger in the box with new iPhone 11 Pros, the vast majority of iOS devices continue to ship with power adapters that don’t take full advantage of their charging capabilities. Unfortunately, you still have to pay extra for a good third-party USB-C PD wall charger in order to refill most iPhones and iPads as fast as possible.
We have a couple of preferred options: if you need a charger for your desk, try Nekteck’s 4-port 72W USB-C PD Charger. It’s a small brick that plugs into an outlet and carries four charging ports, including a 60W USB-C PD port that can easily charge all iPhones and iPads at max speeds (and charge various laptops to boot). There are three 12W USB-A ports as well, so you can refill an iPhone and iPad simultaneously, albeit with one device charging at less-than-optimum speeds. (As its name implies, the device can output a maximum of 72W at once.) There’s a USB-C to USB-C charging cable in the box, and the charger is USB-IF certified, meaning it has been verified to work safely by the body that maintains the USB standard.
For a wall charger that you can take with you more easily, we like RAVPower’s PD Pioneer 45W GaN Wall Charger. As you might guess, this charger uses gallium nitride (GaN), a semiconductor that allows chargers like this to provide the power of traditional silicon in a smaller footprint. Its rectangular design measures 72×54×14.2mm and weighs 2.6 ounces, which makes it significantly smaller and slimmer than a traditional wall charger. It’s more elongated than other GaN chargers like Anker’s PowerPort Atom PD 1, so it might take up more room on a power strip, but its foldable prongs and slim profile makes it easier to squeeze into tighter spaces. (Between an outlet and a piece of furniture, for instance.)
There’s only one port here, but it’s a 45W USB-C PD connector that, again, is capable of charging all iPhones and iPads as fast as possible. This one isn’t USB-IF certified and technically goes against the official USB-C spec by supporting Quick Charge 3.0 over its port, but various chargers have done that in the past without issue. We couldn’t find any sustained complaints over reliability online, and we’ve tested the charger with various devices over the past several months with no problems. It’s not the most affordable 45W wall charger, and you’ll need to supply your own USB-C to Lightning or USB-C to USB–C cable, but we think the combination of power and travel-friendly design is worth a few bucks extra.
RAVPower's Qi fast charger may not stick out in a bucket of wireless charging pads, but it sets itself apart by providing the most energy in a short amount of time. On average, smartphones had 34% juice after just one hour sitting on the RAVPower charging pad, so you'll get a solid amount of juice in your device even if you have little time to spare for charging. It may not be the fanciest looking charger or even the thinnest we've come across, but it still has a solid design that is made better by rubberized rings on its top and bottom that prevent the pad from moving and prevent your smartphone from sliding off.
We also appreciate that RAVPower includes a fast-charge capable AC adapter with this pad, so you're guaranteed to get max charging speeds without needing any additional adapters. If you want a wireless charging pad that looks a bit nicer, Mophie's Charge Stream Pad+ is a good option that performs nearly as well in terms of charging time, but it costs a bit more money.
For better or worse, modern iOS devices are adamant about making you use Bluetooth headphones. The iPhone ditched the headphone jack back in 2016, the iPad Pro followed suit last year, and neither looks likely to bring it back any time soon. Along the way, Apple has furthered a trend in which a manufacturer’s headphones work best with its own platform.
In this case, headphones with Apple’s H1 and W1 wireless chips—which are currently exclusive to Apple’s AirPods and headphones from the company’s Beats subsidiary—are more convenient to use with iPhones and iPads. They have a simplified pairing process, immediately get remembered across your iCloud devices, keep a more stable and power-efficient wireless connection, and, with H1 headphones, let you access Siri just by saying “Hey Siri.” So while there are tons of pairs that sound better and may be more comfortable to wear, Apple’s own pairs present the least friction—again, for better or worse.
We're still in the process of testing the just-announced AirPods Pro, but if you don’t mind giving in to ecosystem lock-in, our favorite Apple-made headphones for now are the Beats Powerbeats Pro. They’re true wireless earphones that do everything the regular AirPods do, but better. They have a more dynamic sound, for one: like any true wireless headphone, they’re still limited in soundstage and finer detail, but their bass-forward profile is lively and fun, if not exactly accurate. This is largely due to the Powerbeats Pro creating a tighter seal in the ear: it’s not airtight, so the outside world won’t be blocked out completely, but it lets in far less noise than the AirPods, which can be difficult to use in louder environments.
The Powerbeats Pro’s battery life is far superior to any other true wireless headphone we’ve used, lasting about 11 hours per charge in our testing—where we stream music to headphones continuously at 67% volume—with a total of 24 hours advertised through its charging case. By comparison, Apple rates the AirPods and AirPods Pro at five hours each, again bumped up to 24 with their charging cases. Either way, the Powerbeats Pro pair just as easily with iOS devices and keep just as reliable a Bluetooth connection—they can still experience dropouts in extremely hectic environments (think something like Times Square) but that remains the case with most true wireless pairs.
Their design is more agreeable, too. Whereas the AirPods can tend to hang loose in the ear, the sporty ear hooks of the Powerbeats Pro keep them nice and secure, even during intense workouts and runs. Their IPX4 sweat-resistance rating is relatively mild for exercise-minded earphones, but it’s equal to the AirPods Pro and a step up from the AirPods, which have no formal rating at all. Beyond that, they have physical playback and volume buttons that are mirrored on each earpiece, instead of relying on less precise touch controls. (And in the AirPods Pro's case, having no built-in volume controls whatsoever.)
There are two major drawbacks to the Powerbeats Pro. First, their case is almost comically huge, to the point where it could be difficult to fit in most pants pockets. You’ll usually want to leave it at home or in a separate bag. Second, they're undeniably expensive: at $250, and without any special app-driven features or active noise cancellation a la the AirPods Pro, they certainly carry the “tax” that typically comes with the Beats/Apple branding. The AirPods and the on-ear Beats Solo 3 Wireless are decent alternatives with similar W1/H1 chip benefits if you want something slightly more affordable. But if you can pay the premium (or just see them on sale), the Powerbeats Pro are arguably the best true wireless headphones for anyone, let alone iOS users.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best 3.5mm to Bluetooth adapter
Fiio μBTR
The Fiio μBTR can make your older wired headphones (like the Koss Porta Pro here) work over Bluetooth.
Jeff Dunn
It's tiny and discreet, with a handy built-in clip.
Jeff Dunn
If you’ve already invested in a good pair of wired headphones, though, there are a couple of ways to continue using them with an iPhone or iPad Pro. The simplest would be to buy a Lightning-to-3.5mm dongle: it’s not an elegant solution, and it’s frustrating that Apple no longer packages one with new iPhones, but it’s only $9 and works easily enough. With newer iPad Pros, it’s the same deal, only you’d need a USB-C to 3.5mm dongle.
If you want at least some of the convenience of a wireless headphone, however, you could buy a Bluetooth headphone adapter. This pairs with your phone or tablet over Bluetooth, receives that source device’s audio, and sends it to whatever pair of 3.5mm headphones you plug into the adapter. You’re then free to keep your device charging across the room, keep it in a separate pocket or bag, and generally use it without any wires attached.
Of the Bluetooth headphone adapters we’ve tested, our favorite is the Fiio μBTR. It paired as easily as any other modern Bluetooth device and presented no significant connection hiccups or latency issues in testing. Sending audio over Bluetooth means an inherent loss in audio quality compared to a wired connection, but for what it is the μBTR doesn’t sacrifice too much fidelity. Importantly, it supports the AAC audio codec, which makes music sound noticeably sharper on an iPhone or iPad than the default SBC codec. (It also supports aptX if you ever use it with a Mac or Android device.) Just know that if your headphones have a particularly high impedance, you’ll likely need to turn up the volume a bit higher than usual.
The μBTR’s stick-style design is tiny and easily portable, with a built-in clip that neatly attaches to a pants or shirt pocket. There are dedicated buttons for volume, pause/play, and voice assistant activation, though its volume level won’t sync with your source device. Its 8-9 hours of battery life should be enough to get through a typical workday, and it charges quickly through a USB-C port. The built-in mic isn’t great for making calls or using Siri, but it’s at least there in a pinch. It’d still be nice if your iPhone didn’t make devices like this desirable in the first place, but for $30, the μBTR isn’t a huge investment for something that effectively makes your most beloved headphones more convenient on the go.
While the built-in speakers on iPhones and iPads have improved as the years have rolled on—particularly on recent iPad Pro models—they still aren’t the best for truly enjoying music. A good Bluetooth speaker can address that. We wouldn’t recommend paying a ton here given the inherent compromises with Bluetooth audio: you typically need to pay a premium for something large enough to sound passable, and at that point you might as well buy a Wi-Fi speaker that’ll sound significantly better. But for less than $100, the UE Wonderboom 2 achieves most of the things you’d want a portable wireless speaker to do well.
Chief among those: it’s really portable, with a squat candle-like shape that’s just 104mm high and 95.3mm wide. It’s also supremely durable, with an IP67 rating—meaning it’s waterproof and dustproof—and a fabric- and rubber-coated design that floats in water and can withstand drops from five or so feet without any signs of scuffing. A built-in elastic loop makes it easy to clip to a bag or hang from a towel hook. The giant volume buttons and playback controls on top are generally easy to comprehend and operate, though you can only skip tracks forward, not backward. Battery life is fine, if not spectacular, at about 9-10 hours a charge, but the speaker disappointingly charges over microUSB instead of a faster USB-C standard.
No Bluetooth speaker this small will produce fantastic audio in a vacuum. The Wonderboom 2 doesn’t change that: it can distort at the highest volumes, it loses detail with more complex tracks, and it has just about nothing when it comes to deep sub-bass. But given the context, it plays loud and relatively balanced, with good mids that make vocals nicely clear. You usually won’t hear the whole of a song, but you’ll get enough to make it enjoyable. You can use a second Wonderboom speaker to play in stereo as well. On its own, we found the Wonderboom 2 to sound cleaner than the Anker Soundcore Flare and Tribit StormBox, two speakers we’ve recommended in past gift guides, so it more than holds its own in the sub-$100 range.
In all, the Wonderboom 2 is something of an ideal portable Bluetooth speaker: it’s rugged, travel-friendly, easy to use, good-looking, and fun-enough sounding. For the shower, pool parties, or just better personal listening at home, it’s a nifty complement to your iPhone or iPad.
Lots of people in my life could use more storage on their iPhones. Even if 32GB iPhones are a thing of the past, it’s still easy to fill up your phone’s storage with photos, videos, games, music, and the like. SanDisk’s iXpand Flash Drive make it easy to keep track of all your digital belongings while freeing up space on your iPhone or iPad. Its Lightning connector plugs into your device and, using the iXpand app, lets you choose which content you want to transfer to the drive and erase from your device.
The iXpand app takes nothing to learn how to use, and you can see the files on the drive and those on your iPhone from directly in the app. I use mine to remove vacation photos from my iPhone so I can transfer them to my PC, and I appreciate that the iXpand drive saves the image as well as a .mov file for those images that were taken as Live Photos. The drive also supports an auto backup feature that will save all your content every time you plug it in. Starting at $59, it’s an affordable way to make your iPhone or iPad feel a bit more like new.
In the same vein as the iXpand is SanDisk's Ultra Dual Drive, a USB-C flash drive that can help those with USB-C smartphones free up space on their devices. With max 150MB/s read speeds, it's not as fast as some USB-C adapters or hubs, but those devices only serve as bridges between two devices sharing data. SanDisk's drive is handy to have if and when you run out of storage unexpectedly and need to free up space immediately without losing any of your existing data. It's also a convenient sharing device thanks to its retractable design that lets it connect to both USB-C and USB-A devices. As more laptops and smartphones switch to USB-C, SanDisk's dual drive could end up being the only flash drive you need going forward to connect to new and old devices.
The USB-C ports on the newest iPad Pros open the tablets up to a new world of capabilities and accessories, including hubs and docks. While almost any USB-C hub would enhance the versatility of the iPad, OWC's Travel Dock provides the best combination of features, speed, and portability.
The new hockey-puck-sized hub connects to the iPad (and other USB-C devices) using a built-in cable that hides neatly on its underside when not in use. In our testing, it had solid data transfer speeds that were close to those of docks and hubs that are designed to be stationary on a desk. It has one USB-C port for PD pass-through, two USB-A 3.1 Gen 1 ports, one HDMI port, and one SD card reader—ports that should be enough to keep your iPad connected (and charged up) no matter where you are. We wish it had an Ethernet port, but that's a small price to pay for an otherwise solid portable hub that doesn't break the bank at $39.99.
Apple's own adapters, such as its USB-C to USB-A adapter, are good alternatives if you only need one specific port or prefer not to have a hub hanging off of your computer.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best game controller
Microsoft Xbox One Wireless Controller (Model 1708)
Sony DualShock 4
Enlarge/ The Xbox One Wireless Controller and Sony's DualShock 4 controller.
Jeff Dunn
With iOS 13 adding formal support for Microsoft’s Xbox One Wireless Controller and Sony’s DualShock 4 gamepad, figuring out the best game controller for the iPhone and iPad has become much simpler: just buy whichever console controller you prefer. If you’ve ever used an Xbox One (or Xbox 360) or PlayStation 4, chances are you already know which design you find more comfortable.
Personally, despite using the PS4 as my primary console for most of this past generation of consoles, I gravitate toward the Xbox One pad. Its asymmetrical joystick layout feels more natural to my hands, its triggers are springier, and its d-pad is less mushy. It requires AA batteries—unless you pay an extra $20-25 for Microsoft’s rechargeable battery kit—but it gets much more battery life per “charge” than the DualShock 4’s built-in unit, which tends to degrade to a fairly poor level over time. (Investing in a good set of rechargeable AA batteries and a charger is a good idea anyway.) And if you ever want to play games on the PC, the Xbox One pad is easier to set up on Windows, particularly with clients besides Steam.
That said, the DualShock 4’s joysticks are larger and softer to the touch, and the whole pad is a better fit for smaller hands. Naturally, it’s also better suited for the PS4 Remote Play app. And both are a breeze to pair with an iOS device. It’s really something of a toss-up: if you don’t want to just use whichever controller already came with your chosen console, the right answer is usually whichever is cheaper at the time.
Either way, there’s some fine print to keep in mind here. iOS games are still meant to be played with your fingers first, and while more and more titles do have controller support—including many of those included in Apple’s new Arcade service—there’s no guarantee their interfaces will match the icons on your gamepad. One game’s A button may be your controller’s X button. Rumble support and other advanced features may not always work, either. And if you opt for the Xbox One pad, you’ll need to make sure it’s a model 1708 controller, which launched alongside the Xbox One S and includes Bluetooth support. The link below is safe as of this writing, but you can verify you have the right model by checking the label within the battery compartment of your gamepad or by ensuring the surface around the Xbox button isn’t glossy.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best iPhone and iPad stands
Pop Socket
I’ve had friends admonish me for using Pop Sockets on my smartphone cases, but I brush this off every time. While they may be the staple accessory for teens and college kids alike, Pop Sockets are actually great smartphone stands that aren’t stationary. Some will prefer an actual desk accessory that props your smartphone up, but I love the portability of Pop Sockets. Stick one or two to your smartphone case (or to the smartphone itself—don’t worry, you can get them off if you really have to)—and you have a relatively unobtrusive kickstand of sorts that props the smartphone up in landscape mode quite well.
I regularly use my Pop Socket to make watching videos on my iPhone easier and to make viewing photos, documents, and other things more convenient when I’m on the go. I also use these little popping disks to grip my smartphone more easily, and that comes in handy when I’m taking photos (selfies and regular photos) or when I have a bunch of other things to hold and only have two fingers to grip my smartphone.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Tomtoc Play Stand
The Tomtoc Play Stand.
Jeff Dunn
There are cutouts on the back for running through a charging cable.
Jeff Dunn
If you’re just not into the Pop Socket’s style, we also like Tomtoc’s Play Stand. While Tomtoc technically markets it for the Nintendo Switch—and it works great for that purpose—it’s just as useful for an iPhone or iPad mini. Its aluminum frame feels sturdy and substantial, with small rubber grips on the base and “lip” that keep an iPhone and the stand itself steadily in place. Since it’s designed to hold a Switch, that lip provides plenty of room for whatever case you may have protecting your device.
The stand as a whole is highly adjustable, with a couple of freely movable hinges that don’t restrict your device to fixed heights and angles. It can fold it up flat, making it particularly easy to stash in a bag or purse, and a hole in the back lets you run a charging cable to your device without having to take it off the stand. It's going for $12 as of this writing, which is good value.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Stump Stand
The Stump Stand.
Jeff Dunn
Here it is holding a 10.5-inch iPad Pro.
Jeff Dunn
For larger iPads, meanwhile, consider the Stump Stand. This little chunk of silicone isn’t as portable or adjustable as our other picks, but its weighted base and grippy bottom keep it stuck in place—and keep your device from shaking heavily when you need to use it. It only allows for three viewing angles—almost straight up, almost down flat, and one angle in between—and it’s somewhat heavy at 9.5 ounces, but the design is far from oversized and keeps a low profile. If your iPhone or iPad still has a Home button, there’s also a small cutout for pressing that without having to pick up your device. The $25 asking price is a bit high, but for a stand that’ll keep your iPad reliably in place without eating up too much desk space, it’s a good buy.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best iPhone cases
Speck Presidio Pro
Otterbox Commuter
I never have a naked smartphone because I want my most used device to be protected at all times. While you can find affordable iPhone cases almost anywhere you go, there's something to be said for spending a bit more on a case if you value protection over fashion.
Two of my favorites are the Speck Presidio Pro case and the Otterbox Commuter case, and I use them both for different reasons. Speck's Presidio Pro is more of an everyday case because it's a great combination of protection and fashion—it protects your iPhone from drops up to 10 feet, and its soft matte finish is more luxurious than that of a flimsy, plastic case.
I break out the Otterbox Commuter case when I'm going on a day trip or a full vacation. Whether I'm hiking in a national park or hoofing it around an unfamiliar city, the Commuter case gives my iPhone extra drop protection, and I like the added Lightning cover that prevents dust from getting inside the charging port. It's bulkier than the Presidio Pro, but the extra protection is worth the added heft in those particular situations. It's also quite easy to get my iPhone in and out of the Commuter case thanks to its double-layer design.
If you do anything more strenuous with your smartphone camera than take photos of your cat, the DJI Osmo Mobile 3 will make things better. The newest version of DJI’s gimbal makes smartphone photography and videography easier with a plethora of features, but it’s even better now because it’s foldable. It may still be an awkwardly shaped accessory (both when in use and when folded), but now it won’t take up nearly as much space in your bag as previous models did.
The Osmo Mobile 3 has all the same features that the Osmo Mobile 2 did, including gesture control, active track, and now improved on-device controls (there’s a grand total of five buttons on the handle). It also has a USB port so you can charge your smartphone while you’re using it in the gimbal. At $139, it’s a great value accessory that can visibly improve your photo and video skills without breaking the bank.
The Apple Pencil opens up a whole new world of things you can do on iPads. While the experience of writing or drawing on a tablet is never quite the same as doing so with a pen and paper, the Apple Pencil will get you as close to that experience as you can get. Its design mimics a real pencil or pen (just a slightly longer one), and there’s little to no latency when using it to write on an iPad’s screen. Pressure sensitivity lets you create thinner or thicker lines depending on how hard you press, and the Pencil pairs wirelessly and automatically when it snaps magnetically to your iPad’s edges. The second-gen Pencil charges wirelessly as well.
Like most of Apple’s accessories, the Pencil is the best stylus option for the iPad because it was designed specifically to work with iPadOS. But it is on the expensive side ($129 for the second-gen and $99 for the first-gen), leaving room for the $54 Logitech Crayon to be a good, affordable alternative. It’s not pressure sensitive like the Apple Pencil, and it has a chunkier design, but it’s nearly as good in terms of latency and is less of a hassle to charge than the first-gen Apple Pencil, thanks to its built-in Lightning port.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best iPad keyboard case
Apple Smart Keyboard
Apple's Smart Keyboard with a 10.5-inch iPad Air.
Jeff Dunn
The 10.5-inch model only supports one angle, but it's extremely thin.
Jeff Dunn
It also doubles as a case, though for the 10.5-inch model it doesn't cover the rear of the tablet.
Jeff Dunn
While Apple posits the iPad Pro as its true what’s-a-computer laptop replacement, the iPad Air and 10.2-inch iPad are capable of getting some level of work done as well, particularly when it comes to word processing. You’ll need an external keyboard to make that work, though. If you’d prefer that keyboard to double as an iPad case, Apple’s own Smart Keyboard (for the 3rd-gen iPad Air and 7th-gen iPad) and Smart Keyboard Folio (for the latest iPad Pros) are your best bets. (We dismissed iPad mini keyboard cases here as they’re too cramped to use comfortably.)
The big draw here is that these keyboards are two of the only devices that make use of Apple’s Smart Connector, which requires no Bluetooth pairing process or battery management. You snap them to the iPad and everything just works. Each device is lightweight and adds little bulk to an iPad, while the fabric-coated keys are water-resistant and easy to keep clean of gunk, since there are no crevices or openings on the boards to begin with. When you’re not typing, the keyboards serve as handy iPad stands, though the standard Smart Keyboard only lets you position your iPad at one angle, whereas the Folio supports two.
Actually typing with the Smart Keyboard isn’t what we’d call a revelation, but it’s fine. This is a far cry from a Lenovo ThinkPad, borrowing more from the super low travel of recent MacBook keyboards instead. Slamming on them for several hours straight could get fatiguing, and there's no backlight whatsoever. But the keys are raised and spaced out well enough to avoid mistakes, the low travel makes them relatively fast to use, and that fabric coating does have a nice, smooth feel.
Both Smart Keyboards are priced higher than we’d like, and the lack of a rear cover on the 7th-gen iPad and 3rd-gen iPad Air model is something Apple probably should have addressed by now. But the convenience of the Smart Connector adds up over time, and for the kind of genuine-but-not-heavy-duty work for which iPadOS is best suited, the actual keyboard is comfortable and pleasant enough to not be a bother.
(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this post through affiliate programs.)
Best keyboard
Logitech K780
The Logitech K780 wireless keyboard.
Jeff Dunn
There's a built-in stand for holding up phones and tablets.
Jeff Dunn
If you do the majority of your iPad work in one place, however, we’d forego the case and get a dedicated keyboard in the form of the Logitech K780. Given that it weighs roughly two pounds and includes a number pad, it’s not the easiest thing to take on the road. But at 158mm×380mm×22mm, it’s still smaller than most full-size keyboards, and that weight helps it stay nice and steady on a desk or table. A built-in device cradle also makes it easy to stash an iPad right in front of you while you work. Its rounded keys may feel peculiar at first, but they’re distinguished and largely satisfying to type on—not as deep or tactile as a good mechanical keyboard, but quiet and comfortable for a wireless multi-device option.
That multi-device aspect means the K780 can pair with up to three devices at once, either via Bluetooth or a USB-A dongle. A trio of buttons at the top of the keyboard let you quickly switch between profiles, so you can easily jump from typing on an iPhone to an iPad to a Mac. Logitech rates its battery life at two years through a pre-installed pair of AAA batteries; we’ve yet to require a new set after more than a year of use.
The downsides here aren’t insignificant: there’s no backlighting, and while the shrunken arrow keys help reduce the K780’s overall footprint, they can be a pain to use. But for $60 or so, it’s a good value for a dedicated keyboard that lends itself well to working on an iOS device. If you don’t think the device stand or number pad are worth it, though, Logitech sells a smaller model called the K380 that has a similar key feel and costs $30-40.
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19334276/airpods_pro_2.jpg)
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19334277/airpods_pro_3.jpg)
